| Adapted from
an article first published in green@work,
November/December 2001.
Designers are uniquely empowered to act on their hopes.
As the creators of products and systems and the built environment,
they are the dreamers who turn inspiration into the actual
world we inhabit-the cherished things we use everyday, the
places we live and work, our much loved modes of communication
and mobility.
We could say, in fact, that design conceives our future;
it is the first signal of human intention and it sets in
motion a whole range of effects that ripple through human
communities and the natural world-today, tomorrow and in
some cases, nearly forever.
So what kind of future do we want to conceive? How can
we act on our hopes intelligently to create a world of prosperity,
abundance and delight? In this, the last of a five part
series on ecologically intelligent design-what we call eco-effectiveness-we
suggest some of the ways in which true innovation can achieve
a broad spectrum of positive, regenerative effects on the
world, allowing commerce, community and nature to thrive
and grow.
The Five-Step Path
Our five-step strategy of eco-effective design describes
a process in which designers employ an ever-broadening ability
to define, select, and ultimately re-invent product ingredients,
industrial systems, and even the relationship between producers
and customers. Its intention is nothing less than the transformation
of human industry; it seeks a world in which the production
and consumption of goods is not only safe and profitable
but ecologically enriching and socially valuable.
You may recall that the first step in the strategy aims
to remove from a product a specific chemical widely known
to be harmful, such as lead or chlorine. The second step
begins a more comprehensive review in which a customer or
manufacturer makes a list of preferred, readily available
materials known to be safely created or harvested with minimal
impact.
Moving along the five-step path, designers begin to examine
all of a product's materials rather than simply removing
the most onerous substances or adding a few elements that
are "less bad." At Step Three designers examine
the palette of materials used in an existing product while
it continues to be manufactured. The goal is to replace
problematic ingredients without missing a beat in the marketplace.
A company that manufactures polyester fabric, for example,
can keep its machines humming as it replaces the input of
a dangerous polymer with one that does not contain substances
of serious concern.
Step Four is the true entry into eco-effective design.
At this point in the journey designers aim to actively define
a product's ingredients, right from the start. The idea
is not to limit the impact of a product or system but to
conceive one with positive effects on the world.
A designer aiming for positive effects employs the intelligence
of natural systems-the effectiveness of nutrient cycling,
the abundance of the sun's energy-to create products actively
defined as nutrients for the Earth's two discrete metabolisms,
the cycles of nature and the cycles of industry. In a world
of what we call cradle-to-cradle design, a product's biological
nutrients and technical nutrients would flow in one or the
other of these discrete, closed-loop cycles, providing nourishment
for something new after each useful life. In the textile
industry, for instance, we've helped companies conceive
fabrics as both biological and technical nutrients-food
for local soils and rematerialized ingredients for industry.
And now Step Five, true innovation.
The Fruits of Re-Invention
We've used the preparation of a meal as a metaphor for the
step-by-step process of eco-effective design. At each phase,
the designer-the host and chef-begins to create the meal
by asking a simple question: What is my intention? At Step
One, aiming to be "free of" a dangerous ingredient,
her meal might have resembled a humble dinner prepared to
avoid an offending food-a meal without meat, or dairy, or
sugar. Moving through the steps, the chef's choices widen
as she identifies new intentions. By Step Four she is actively
choosing ingredients to create a meal that is nourishing,
tasty, and fulfilling.
If Steps One to Four are a dinner of ever increasing pleasures,
Step Five is more than dessert: It's a party.
From a design perspective, embracing a festive spirit means
bringing inventive energy to the table and asking not simply
what ingredients would be nutritious but how a product or
service might best celebrate a basic human need, revitalize
an aspect of culture, or renew our engagement with the natural
world. One might begin to ask: How might my product fulfill
people's wants, needs and loves? Are my current business
practices the best way to provide my service to customers?
What service am I providing, anyway?
Consider the automobile. We don't have to list the ways
in which car owners have begun to feel that their need for
mobility is in conflict with their desire for a convivial,
healthy world. But rather than declare the car the enemy,
we would suggest that it's just not serving our needs very
effectively. It's ripe for innovation.
A designer might respond to this challenge by creating
a more efficient car that has a minimal impact on the environment,
such as a hydrogen-powered hypercar free of carbon emissions.
One could also employ a preference for a safe, organic upholstery
fabric, or begin to reassess each material used in the making
of automobiles. Ultimately, manufacturers might optimize
their vehicles by using positively defined biological and
technical nutrients and creating a coherent system for the
retrieval and reuse of the cars valuable materials.
Each of these solutions reflects one of the values on the
step-by-step path of eco-effective design. Together, they
add up to revolutionary changes-changes that we are actively
working to bring about with car manufacturers and auto parts
suppliers. But we think there's yet another crucial step:
What if we thought of the auto industry not simply as a
maker of cars but as a provider of mobility? How might the
industry best provide the service of mobility to meet the
wants, needs and loves of its customers? Could we design
new kinds of mobility systems that serve a rich social agenda?
Well, yes. If we explore not just the car but the many
needs it fulfills, we can begin to imagine the re-invention
of the whole paradigm of transportation. As a mobility provider,
for example, a manufacturer might offer customers access
to many different kinds of vehicles rather than selling
them a car. Why own and maintain three cars when you could
use the service of a big, spacious vehicle for family trips,
a sports car for a weekend date, or a public community car
to transport your children? In each case you'd be provided
the service of mobility by an automaker that owned and reused
the vehicles' valuable materials-and utilized them effectively
by keeping their resources in motion.
Take the community car. As part of a broadly defined local
or regional transportation plan, a fleet of community cars
could provide people a range of services throughout the
day. Responding to electronic calls, the cars could deliver
people to transportation hubs in the morning; ferry groceries,
laundry, and prescriptions during the day; deliver children
from school to violin practice or their grandmother's house
in the late afternoon; and take couples to the movies at
night.
Built and used within an evolving system of coherent material
flows, the community cars could manifest a wide spectrum
of positive effects. People formerly excluded from transportation-children,
the elderly, the handicapped-would have ready access to
mobility. The retirees operating the community cars would
be able to maintain their sense of community and their ties
to the young. The system's effectiveness-its ability to
both optimize the use of materials and conveniently move
people to the places they want to go-would generate wealth
for providers and satisfaction, free time, and peace of
mind for customers.
The re-invention of mobility illustrates a key principle
of eco-effective innovation: products are essentially packaging
for services. With this in mind, designers can begin to
apply the Five Steps to all products of service, conceiving
effective, intelligent systems for meeting the most basic
human needs-like washing one's clothes.
A designer developing an eco-effective laundry detergent,
for example, might follow Steps One-Four to progressively
create a product with only safe, nutritious ingredients.
A Step Four soap might be defined by the chemistry of the
local water supply. It might also be produced locally in
dry pellet form and sold in bulk, obviating the need for
packaging and the expensive long-distance transportation
of heavy, liquid concentrates.
At Step Five one might build on the reformulation of soap
to develop a strategy for delivering an effective laundering
service to the home. This strategy would include the washing
machine itself, which would be conceived as a product of
service designed for retrieval, disassembly and reuse. The
machine would be delivered to a customer's home pre-loaded
with detergent for 1000 loads of laundry-the customer pays
not for the machine, but for the service. After the last
of the machine's micro-filtered detergent has been dispensed,
the appliance would be serviced or replaced, and its valuable
materials would enter the technical metabolism to be used
again in new machines.
An innovative commercial venture might focus on providing
a community laundry service. Laundry could be picked up
from customers in a community vehicle and delivered to one
location, where washing machines would run on the power
of the sun and wastewater would be purified by a system
of botanical gardens. The service might even provide a social
venue, where those who chose to wash their own clothes could
relax in a pleasant courtyard among the garden's flowering
plants. Washing clothes, long considered environmentally
unfriendly, suddenly begins to generate community wealth.
A Hopeful Agenda
When companies adopt an eco-effective strategy and engage
in meeting customers needs with a broadly conceived, positive
agenda, they are charting a course that departs from the
conventional notion of sustainability or efficiency. Sustainability,
after all, is merely a minimum precondition of survival-hardly
an enticing prospect. Indeed, if minimizing the human impact
on the world through ever more efficient design guided our
vision it would be difficult to imagine a hopeful future.
If, for example, the United States embraced efficiency
and dramatically cut energy consumption and waste production
down to current European levels, it would not forestall
destruction nor significantly shrink our ecological footprint.
The kinds of efficiencies required to sustain the current
industrial system would be much more draconian, like cutting
population by 75 percent. In such a world, celebrations
of abundance, cultural diversity, or the lives of our children
could only be muted, at best.
But what if we sought a bigger ecological footprint? Materials
and products designed as nutrients can actually make humanity
a regenerative force. Industrial sites can restore landscapes
and invite the return of native species. Buildings can purify
water and create more energy than they consume. And nutritious
material flows, while supporting life systems, can provide
more people with more of what they need and love.
Innovative companies already pursuing these strategies
are finding their way by listening to signals from outside
the company itself-signals in the community, the environment
and the world at large. And they are staying on track by
allowing a few basic principles to guide their work:
Signal Your Intention: Commit
to a new paradigm rather than to an incremental improvement
of the old. The eco-effective strategy takes into account
that we are not in a perfect world; we are all, in some
ways, in transition. But successful ventures, such as the
carpet industry's adoption of a system for the retrieval
and reuse of floor covering materials, are showing that
embracing real innovation within the context of today's
market is not only possible, it's the key to a prosperous
future.
Restore: Strive for "good growth,"
not just economic growth. Innovation allows a company
to examine how it might generate community wealth or restore
natural systems as it serves its customers. Ford
Motor Company, for example, has embarked on the long-term
restoration of its historic Rouge
River site. Its new assembly plant will feature a roof
covered with growing plants-a living roof-that filters stormwater
runoff in concert with porous paving and a series of wetlands
and swales. Replacing the expensive technical controls called
for by new regulations, these measures stand to save Ford
up to $35 million while purifying the waters flowing into
the Rouge.
Feed Forward: Perfecting an existing
product is not necessarily a good investment. Maybe it's
time to create a new niche. Currently, many designers are
productively engaged developing safe dyes for fabric. But
what if dye were obsolete? We looked to birds for guidance
on that question and learned that the brilliance of avian
plumage is a prismatic effect; birds' feathers are essentially
clear and reflect different parts of the spectrum. Imagine
polymers designed in various crystalline shapes shimmering
with color. Imagine light replacing chemicals in the textile
industry.
Prepare for the Learning Curve: Recognize
that change is difficult, messy, and time consuming. Nike
is currently working on a number of initiatives, such as
designing shoe materials for true recycling, that will take
time to come to fruition. The company is well aware that
innovation typically has a success rate of about 10-15 percent,
so it is initiating many pilot programs to understand the
dynamics of its future product take-back program. But the
company presses on. As Nike's Darcy Winslow says, this is
not about compliance, it's about leadership.
Celebrate Your Legacy: Understand
and celebrate the far-reaching impact of your creative acts.
Design can create effects from the molecule to the region,
influencing everything from soil chemistry to the well-being
of workers in a sunlit factory. The educator David Orr has
pointed out that the design of buildings teaches us about
our world-how we use resources, how we relate to nature-and
he's embraced his legacy as a teacher by working with us
to conceive a truly innovative university building, a building
like a tree. Using nature as a model for design, the building
accrues solar income, purifies water, provides habitat for
native species and offers a generation of students an opportunity
to develop a deep relationship with the natural world.
Accept Intergenerational Responsibility:
David Orr's legacy answers the questions posed by our final
principle: How can we support the rights of all living things
to share in the world's abundance? How can we love all of
the children of all species for all time? A building that
nourishes its surroundings and the minds of those who inhabit
it is a step in the right direction. As Orr told green@work:
"The X generation doesn't see much hope in the world.
I wanted to give them a sense of hope and the competence
to act on that hope. This building gives them possibilities,
not just wishful thinking."
There's no better way to describe the true intention of
innovative design.
|